On 28 June 2015 at 19:52, Sergei Antonov <saproj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snipped> > If I fix something else in hfsplus in the future, will you again > submit a combined hfsplus+hfs patch? I would prefer separation. Hoped > to receive your "Tested-by:" for my "hfsplus: release bnode pages > after use, not before" and then submit a V2 of it with a longer > description. Possibly yes, if the patch description is clearly unsatisfactory and deemed incomprehensible, and you have not re-submitted a v2 within a reasonable time. I already explained why I re-submitted with a different patch description in the first of 3 below: [PATCH 0/2] two patches about B-tree corruptions in hfs and hfsplus [PATCH v2] hfs,hfsplus: cache pages correctly between bnode_create and [PATCH] hfs: fix B-tree corruption after insertion at position 0 Please just re-submit v2 yourself if more than a few people thinks your patch description is unsatisfactory, instead of waiting for somebody else to do it for you; and also please just say "thank you", when others are willing spend their valuable time to look at and check and verify what you do. I would not be willing to put my name down with a Test-By: or Signed-of: on your original patch as it was. Hin-Tak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
