On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> More to the point, why bother with ->ioctl() at all? Why not make
> ->fitrim() a super_block method and let do_vfs_ioctl() handle all
> marshalling? As in
> (int *)fitrim(struct super_block *, struct fstrim_range *);
> guaranteed to be called only on a filesystem kept active by caller...
I'd be ok with that, but that's a bigger issue and I think would be a
separate second step from removing the whole compat mess anyway.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
