On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:41:10PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There's a small consistency problem between the inode and writeback > naming. Writeback calls the "for IO" inode queues b_io and > b_more_io, but the inode calls these the "writeback list" or > i_wb_list. This makes it hard to an new "under writeback" list to > the inode, or call it an "under IO" list on the bdi because either > way we'll have writeback on IO and IO on writeback and it'll just be > confusing. I'm getting confused just writing this! > > So, rename the inode "for IO" list variable to i_io_list so we can > add a new "writeback list" in a subsequent patch. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
