On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:27:09PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > If updating journal superblock fails after journal data has been flushed, > the error is omitted and this will mislead the caller as a normal case. > In ocfs2, the checkpoint will be treated successfully and the other node > can get the lock to update. Since the sb_start is still pointing to the > old log block, it will rewrite the journal data during journal recovery > by the other node. Thus the new updates will be overwritten and ocfs2 > corrupts. > So in above case we have to return the error, and ocfs2_commit_cache will > take care of the error and prevent the other node to do update first. > And only after recovering journal it can do the new updates. > > The issue discussion mail can be found at: > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-June/010856.html > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/48841 > > Reported-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
