On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:00:01 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I somehow forgot about these patches. The previous version was > posted here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142668784122763&w=2. The > first attempt was broken but even when fixed it seems like ignoring > mapping_gfp_mask in page_cache_read is too fragile because > filesystems might use locks in their filemap_fault handlers > which could trigger recursion problems as pointed out by Dave > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142682332032293&w=2. > > The first patch should be straightforward fix to obey mapping_gfp_mask > when allocating for mapping. It can be applied even without the second > one. I'm not so sure about that. If only [1/2] is applied then those filesystems which are setting mapping_gfp_mask to GFP_NOFS will now actually start using GFP_NOFS from within page_cache_read() etc. The weaker allocation mode might cause problems. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
