On 21/05/2015 22:31, j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From design point of view not much changed since last patchset (2). > Most of the change are in small details of the API expose to device > driver. This version also include device driver change for Mellanox > hardware to use HMM as an alternative to ODP (which provide a subset > of HMM functionality specificaly for RDMA devices). Long term plan > is to have HMM completely replace ODP. Hi, I think HMM would be a good long term solution indeed. For now I would want to keep ODP and HMM side by side (as the patchset seem to do) mainly since HMM is introduced as a STAGING feature and ODP is part of the mainline kernel. It would be nice if you could provide a git repository to access the patches. I couldn't apply them to the current linux-next tree. A minor thing: I noticed some style issues in the patches. You should run checkpatch.pl on the patches and get them to match the coding style. Regards, Haggai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
