2015-05-29 2:37 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Andreas Grünbacher > <andreas.gruenbacher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2015-05-29 1:11 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> How is this even remotely relevant to ACL functionality, and why does >>> it deserve to bypass the NFS tree? >> >> I've posted this to the linux-nfs mailing list for review among >> others, how is that >> bypassing the NFS tree? Would you prefer those things sent to you personally >> as well? > > No. I'm saying that changes that affect the core RPC code should not > be going through external trees as part of an external feature; they > should go through the maintainer trees. I agree, none of that is going to get merged directly. Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
