On 03/15/2015 08:59 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > This patch series introduces a new clone flag, CLONE_FD, which lets the caller > receive child process exit notification via a file descriptor rather than > SIGCHLD. CLONE_FD makes it possible for libraries to safely launch and manage > child processes on behalf of their caller, *without* taking over process-wide > SIGCHLD handling (either via signal handler or signalfd). > > Note that signalfd for SIGCHLD does not suffice here, because that still > receives notification for all child processes, and interferes with process-wide > signal handling. It has been suggested (e.g., <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15661#c3>) that you can use the existing clone(2) without specifying SIGCHLD to create a new process. The resulting child process is not supposed to show up in wait(2), only in a waitpid(2) (or similar) explicitly specifying the PID. Is this not the case? -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
