Re: [PATCH V6 05/10] audit: log creation and deletion of namespace instances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, May 14, 2015 08:48:55 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/05/14, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > What they would want to know is what resources were assigned; if two
> > containers shared a resource, what resource and container was it shared
> > with; if two containers can communicate, we need to see or control
> > information flow when necessary; and we need to see termination and
> > release of resources.
>
> So, namespaces are a big part of this.  I understand how they are
> spawned and potentially shared.  I have a more vague idea about how
> cgroups contribute to this concept of a container.  So far, I have very
> little idea how seccomp contributes, but I assume that it will also need
> to be part of this tracking.

It doesn't, really.  We shouldn't worry about seccomp from a 
namespace/container auditing perspective.  The normal seccomp auditing should 
be sufficient for namespaces/containers.

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux