I'll push the patch into dev branch right now.
Let me know, if there is any problem.
Thanks,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:40:25AM +0800, hujianyang wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> I've tested this patch. It's OK now. Seems this problem is fixed.
>
> I'd like to push this patch to my local tree and run a formal
> stress test next week. Will you push this patch to f2fs-dev branch?
>
> If you have other modification to this fix, please let me know.
>
> Thanks very much!
> Hu
>
> On 2015/5/14 8:24, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Hu,
> >
> > Found a bug in the previous patch.
> > Could you check this out?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 19438f2..647591b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -431,8 +431,17 @@ static int f2fs_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > * - f2fs_gc -> iput -> evict
> > * - inode_wait_for_writeback(inode)
> > */
> > - if (!inode_unhashed(inode) && inode->i_state & I_SYNC)
> > + if (!inode_unhashed(inode) && inode->i_state & I_SYNC) {
> > + if (!inode->i_nlink && !is_bad_inode(inode)) {
> > + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > + i_size_write(inode, 0);
> > +
> > + if (F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode))
> > + f2fs_truncate(inode);
> > + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > + }
> > return 0;
> > + }
> > return generic_drop_inode(inode);
> > }
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
