Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Daniel Phillips <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:08:04 +0200
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Howard Chu <hyc@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tux3@xxxxxxxx, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <555335FA.3060005@phunq.net>

On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 04:31 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Third possibility: build from our repository, as Mike did.

Sorry about that folks.  I've lost all interest, it won't happen again.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips

References:
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Dave Chinner
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Mike Galbraith
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Mike Galbraith
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Howard Chu
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Pavel Machek
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Pavel Machek
- Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
  - From: Daniel Phillips

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: Pin to vfsmnt instead of mntget
Next by Date: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
Previous by thread: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
Next by thread: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]