Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] bio: Introduce LightNVM payload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:58:51PM +0200, Matias Bj?rling wrote:
> >Can you explain why this needs to be done on a per-bio instead of a
> >per-request level?  I don't really think a low-level driver should add
> >fields to struct bio as that can be easily remapped.
> 
> When a bio is submitted through the block layer, it can be merged/splitted
> on going through the block layer. Thus, we don't know the number of physical
> addresses that must be mapped before its on the other side.

For any sort of passthrough bios that should not be the case.  It's not
for BLOCK_PC, it's not for my new pass through NVMe commands and I don't
think it should be in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux