Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes: > Since the big barrier rewrite/removal in 2007 we never fail FLUSH or > FUA requests, which means we can remove the magic BIO_EOPNOTSUPP flag > to help propagating those to the buffer_head layer. I had a look through the kernel, checking for places where maybe we were relying on an EOPNOTSUPP from REQ_DISCARD, just to ensure you weren't pulling out an error path that could still be used. I think everything checks out. > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > index 992ef58..c2ee937 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > @@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ struct bio { > #define BIO_CLONED 4 /* doesn't own data */ > #define BIO_BOUNCED 5 /* bio is a bounce bio */ > #define BIO_USER_MAPPED 6 /* contains user pages */ > -#define BIO_EOPNOTSUPP 7 /* not supported */ > #define BIO_NULL_MAPPED 8 /* contains invalid user pages */ > #define BIO_QUIET 9 /* Make BIO Quiet */ > #define BIO_SNAP_STABLE 10 /* bio data must be snapshotted during write */ Should we leave a hole in the numbering scheme? Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html