On 04/13/2015 01:22 PM, Zhao Lei wrote:
<>
> A new bad news:
> This patch make filesystem unstable.
>
Rrrr yes sorry Lei. Why this boots my systems is not clear this is not
what I intended to write.
Here is what I meant to write (replacing the old one):
----
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 32a8bbd..e0375e1 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int writeback_in_progress(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_in_progress);
-struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
+struct backing_dev_info *__inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
{
struct super_block *sb;
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
#endif
return sb->s_bdi;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inode_to_bdi);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__inode_to_bdi);
static inline struct inode *wb_inode(struct list_head *head)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index aff923a..53d97cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -107,7 +107,16 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
#endif
};
-struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode);
+struct backing_dev_info *__inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode);
+
+static inline
+struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (!inode || !inode->i_sb || !inode->i_sb->s_bdi)
+ return __inode_to_bdi(inode);
+
+ return inode->i_sb->s_bdi;
+}
int __must_check bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
void bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
