Re: [PATCH/RFC] fscache/cachefiles versus btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Is there a better way?  Could a better way be created?  Maybe
>  SEEK_DATA_RELIABLE ??

fiemap() maybe?

> Also, if you do try to use fscache on btrfs with 3.19, then nothing gets
> cached (as expected) and with a heavy load you can lose a race and get an
> asserting fail in fscache_enqueue_operation

Do you have the patches here applied?

	http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=fscache-fixes

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux