On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > OK, I will send a patch for the fix, with suggested update from > Christoph of not to re-add 'type' argument to e820_end_pfn(). > > Yinghai, I will add your sign-off to the patch. Let me know if you have > any concern. I think we should restore all to original. e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type) e820_end_of_ram_pfn e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn otherwise it will cause confusing, because last two really have ram_pfn, and the first one does not has ram in the function name. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
