'Commit ec776ef6bbe17 ("x86/mm: Add support for the non-standard
protected e820 type")' added E820_PRAM ranges, which do not have
have struct-page. Therefore, there is no need to update max_pfn
to cover the E820_PRAM ranges. Revert the change made to account
E820_PRAM as RAM in e820_end_pfn() in the commit.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
The patch is based on the tip branch.
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index e2ce85d..4dfe4bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -763,11 +763,7 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
unsigned long start_pfn;
unsigned long end_pfn;
- /*
- * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of
- * establishing max_pfn and mem_map.
- */
- if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM)
+ if (ei->type != E820_RAM)
continue;
start_pfn = ei->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
