Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Various recent BIOSes support NVDIMMs or ADR using a non-standard
> e820 memory type, and Intel supplied reference Linux code using this
> type to various vendors.
>
> Wire this e820 table type up to export platform devices for the pmem
> driver so that we can use it in Linux.
>
> Based on arlier work from Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> and
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>.
>
...
> @@ -748,7 +758,7 @@ u64 __init early_reserve_e820(u64 size, u64 align)
>  /*
>   * Find the highest page frame number we have available
>   */
> -static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
> +static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
>  {
>         int i;
>         unsigned long last_pfn = 0;
> @@ -759,7 +769,11 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
>                 unsigned long start_pfn;
>                 unsigned long end_pfn;
>
> -               if (ei->type != type)
> +               /*
> +                * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of
> +                * establishing max_pfn and mem_map.
> +                */
> +               if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM)
>                         continue;
>
>                 start_pfn = ei->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -784,12 +798,12 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
>  }
>  unsigned long __init e820_end_of_ram_pfn(void)
>  {
> -       return e820_end_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN, E820_RAM);
> +       return e820_end_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN);
>  }
>
>  unsigned long __init e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn(void)
>  {
> -       return e820_end_pfn(1UL<<(32 - PAGE_SHIFT), E820_RAM);
> +       return e820_end_pfn(1UL<<(32 - PAGE_SHIFT));
>  }

You are using iomap_nocache to access pmem.

Do you still need to account E820_PRAM to get those end_of_ram ?
You should not need that to help to set kernel mapping.

So please drop those not needed changes.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux