[PATCH 5/5] f2fs: do not recover wrong data index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



During the roll-forward recovery, if we found a new data index written fsync
lastly, we need to recover new block address.
But, if that address was corrupted, we should not recover that.
Otherwise, f2fs gets kernel panic from:

 In check_index_in_prev_nodes(),

    sentry = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
             --------------------------> out-of-range segno.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 63b720b..4b742c9 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -395,7 +395,9 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
 		src = datablock_addr(dn.node_page, dn.ofs_in_node);
 		dest = datablock_addr(page, dn.ofs_in_node);
 
-		if (src != dest && dest != NEW_ADDR && dest != NULL_ADDR) {
+		if (src != dest && dest != NEW_ADDR && dest != NULL_ADDR &&
+			dest >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) && dest < MAX_BLKADDR(sbi)) {
+
 			if (src == NULL_ADDR) {
 				err = reserve_new_block(&dn);
 				/* We should not get -ENOSPC */
-- 
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux