Re: [Linux-nvdimm] another pmem variant V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I'd be fine with that too - mind sending an updated series?
>
> I will send an updated one tonight or early tomorrow.
>
> Btw, do you want to keep the E820_PRAM name instead of E820_PMEM?
> Seems like most people either don't care or prefer E820_PMEM. I'm
> fine either way.

FWIW, I like the idea of having a separate E820_PRAM name for type-12
memory vs future "can't yet disclose" UEFI memory type.  The E820_PRAM
type potentially has the property of being relegated to "legacy"
NVDIMMs.  We can later add E820_PMEM as a memory type that, for
example, is not automatically backed by struct page.  That said, I'm
fine either way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux