Re: [PATCH-v2 1/2] fs: make sure the timestamps for lazytime inodes eventually get written

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Yes, something like this should be possible. But I wanted that to happen
> as a separate patch once we have everything working correctly. The code is
> subtle enough that I didn't want Ted to complicate it with further
> optimizations initially.

Yes, agreed, I took a closer look at it and making the change that
Andreas suggested is more complicated than it first seems.

We can try to fix this later, but it's definitely messy.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux