Re: [RFC v2 1/4] locks: Remove unnecessary IS_POSIX test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon,  2 Mar 2015 15:25:10 +0100
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since following change
> 
> commit bd61e0a9c852de2d705b6f1bb2cc54c5774db570
> Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Jan 16 15:05:55 2015 -0500
> 
>     locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context
> 
> all Posix locks are kept on their a separate list, so the test is
> redudant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 365c82e..f63aa92 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -964,8 +964,6 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
>  	 */
>  	if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
>  		list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
> -			if (!IS_POSIX(fl))
> -				continue;
>  			if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl))
>  				continue;
>  			if (conflock)

Merged for v4.1.

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux