Re: [PATCH v0 0/2] lockperf: New deadlock test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon,  2 Mar 2015 10:43:23 +0100
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Here is another test I wrote in order to benchmark the
> blocked_lock_lock overhead. This simple dinning philosopher test
> exercises that path a bit.
> 
> Daniel Wagner (2):
>   Print leading zeros after decimal point
>   posix04: add new "posix04" test
> 
>  Makefile.am |   2 +-
>  flock01.c   |   2 +-
>  flock02.c   |   2 +-
>  lease01.c   |   2 +-
>  lease02.c   |   2 +-
>  posix01.c   |   2 +-
>  posix02.c   |   2 +-
>  posix03.c   |   2 +-
>  posix04.c   | 288 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 posix04.c
> 

Thanks for the patches. They look fine to me. Merged!

-- 
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux