Re: [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2015 04:23 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
These look good at first glance, but I do need to go over patches 3 and
4 in more detail.

FWIW, usually when I see "RFC" in the subject, I take it as a hint that
this is still work-in-progress and that you're looking for early feedback
on it, and hence they it shouldn't be merged yet. Is that the case
here, or would I be OK to merge these?

I screwed that part over. I wanted to send them as 'PATCH'. Though I have planned to do another benchmark round and see if it there isn't any problem left in there.

Thanks for going easy on me, first time looking at this end of the kernel :)

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux