Re: [RFC 00/21] Richacls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for this!

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:41:21AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> At this point, I would like to ask for your feedback as to what should
> be changed before these patches can be merged, even if merging these
> patches alone doesn't make a while lot of sense.  I will follow up
> with additional pieces to the puzzle like the nfsv4 support as I get
> them into shape again.

I remember my main concern being how we collapse the ACL and mask bits
to map a richacl to an NFSv4 (or Samba) ACL.  I can't remember what the
compromise there ended up being.  I guess I'll watch for that when it
comes.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux