Re: [git pull] more vfs bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> FWIW, I probably should've collapsed the per-fs patches together, or
> held them back until the next cycle; I understand why David did them
> that way (less painful rebasing that stuff)

Actually, that's not why I did it that way.  What I wanted was to get the
wrappers upstream in this window then I could push the individual per-fs
commits to the managers of those filesystems to go through their trees in the
next cycle.

I didn't rebase the scripted commits since I can just rerun the script.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux