On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Fam Zheng <famz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2) epoll_pwait1 > --------------- > > NAME > epoll_pwait1 - wait for an I/O event on an epoll file descriptor > > SYNOPSIS > > #include <sys/epoll.h> > > int epoll_pwait1(int epfd, int flags, > struct epoll_event *events, > int maxevents, > struct timespec *timeout, > struct sigargs *sig); > > DESCRIPTION > > The epoll_pwait1 system call differs from epoll_pwait only in parameter > types. The first difference is timeout, a pointer to timespec structure > which allows nanosecond presicion; the second difference, which should > probably be wrapper by glibc and only expose a sigset_t pointer as in > pselect6. > > If timeout is NULL, it's treated as if 0 is specified in epoll_pwait > (return immediately). Otherwise it's converted to nanosecond scalar, > again, with the same convention as epoll_pwait's timeout. Is the timeout absolute or relative? I'd kind of like the ability to set timeouts on multiple clocks at the same time, but I can live without that. --Andy > > RETURN VALUE > > The same as said in epoll_pwait(2). > > ERRORS > > The same as said in man epoll_pwait(2), plus: > > EINVAL flags is not zero. > > > CONFORMING TO > > epoll_pwait1() is Linux-specific. > > SEE ALSO > > epoll_create(2), epoll_ctl(2), epoll_wait(2), epoll_pwait(2), epoll(7) > > Fam Zheng (7): > epoll: Extract epoll_wait_do and epoll_pwait_do > epoll: Specify clockid explicitly > epoll: Extract ep_ctl_do > epoll: Add implementation for epoll_ctl_batch > x86: Hook up epoll_ctl_batch syscall > epoll: Add implementation for epoll_pwait1 > x86: Hook up epoll_pwait1 syscall > > arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 2 + > arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 2 + > fs/eventpoll.c | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > include/linux/syscalls.h | 9 ++ > include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h | 11 ++ > 5 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.3 > -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
