On Friday, January 23, 2015 05:30:56 AM Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:40:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:29:03PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:25:13PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > Your experimental branch looks good to me, thanks. > > > > > > Pushed into for-next; I'm probably going to move that stuff into a > > > never-rebased branch, merged into for-next and safe to pull into your > > > tree if you want to do something on top of that set. > > > > OK, vfs.git#getname is it; it's in never-to-be-rebased mode and it's > > merged > > into vfs.git#for-next (as of right now; HEAD is 9ee4c4). If you need to > > do > > something on top of that stuff, pulling vfs.git#getname is safe. > > Unfortunately, that thing was -rc2-based, leading to conflict with mainline > in kernel/auditsc.c. My fault, I hadn't realized that "audit: create > private file name copies when auditing inodes" in audit tree was, in fact, > present in mainline. vfs.git#getname2 is -rc3-based, same resulting > kernel/auditsc.c as in #getname. Please, use that. vfs.git#for-next > merges from that one now, so tomorrow -next should have no problems from > vfs.git... No worries, thanks for the update. -- paul moore security @ redhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
