On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:43:02AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 05:08:03PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > Hi Omar,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Most filesystems prevent truncation of an active swapfile by way of
> > > inode_newsize_ok, called from inode_change_ok. NFS doesn't call either
> > > from nfs_setattr, presumably because most of these checks are expected
> > > to be done server-side. However, the IS_SWAPFILE check can only be done
> > > client-side, and truncating a swapfile can't possibly be good.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Hi, Trond,
> > >
> > > Now that the holidays are over, could you take a look at this? It was
> > > generated against v3.19-rc3.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > fs/nfs/inode.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > > index 4bffe63..9205513 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > > @@ -506,10 +506,15 @@ nfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> > > attr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_MODE;
> > >
> > > if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
> > > + loff_t i_size;
> > > +
> > > BUG_ON(!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode));
> > >
> > > - if (attr->ia_size == i_size_read(inode))
> > > + i_size = i_size_read(inode);
> > > + if (attr->ia_size == i_size)
> > > attr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_SIZE;
> > > + else if (attr->ia_size < i_size && IS_SWAPFILE(inode))
> > > + return -ETXTBSY;
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Optimization: if the end result is no change, don't RPC */
> > > --
> > > 2.2.1
> > >
> >
> > I agree that truncating a swap file is bad, however as you point out,
> > this really only addresses the case on the client that knows about
> > this being a swap file.
> > I'll take the patch,
>
> Thanks, I appreciate it.
>
> > but I'm wondering if we couldn't do better in the
> > case where we're using NFSv4 by using share deny modes (which are
> > enforced by the server). The problem is that there appears to be
> > nothing in swapon() that tells the filesystem this is an open of a
> > swap file...
>
> Yeah, it would be nice for completeness to prevent one client from
> truncating another client's swapfile. However, I'd hope that anyone
> using swap-over-NFS on a shared NFS mount would take the necessary
> precautions in terms of permissions, etc. to prevent someone from doing
> that. Also, since the failure mode of truncating an NFS swapfile is a
> corrupt swapfile rather than a corrupt filesystem (like on a local
> filesystem), it's probably okay to just deal with the low-hanging fruit
> for now.
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Cheers
> > Trond
> > --
> > Trond Myklebust
> > Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
> > trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Omar
Hi, Trond,
Are you still planning on taking this patch? I didn't see it in your
last pull request to Linus.
Thanks,
--
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
