On Tue, 01/20 11:37, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20 2015, Fam Zheng <famz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > DESCRIPTION > > > > The epoll_mod_wait() system call can be seen as an enhanced combination > > of several epoll_ctl(2) calls, which are followed by an epoll_pwait(2) > > call. It is superior in two cases: > > > > 1) When epoll_ctl(2) are followed by epoll_wait(2), using epoll_mod_wait > > will save context switches between user mode and kernel mode; > > > > 2) When you need higher precision than microsecond for wait timeout. > > You probably want to say millisecond. Yes, you see that I just can't make this right. :) > > > struct epoll_mod_cmd { > [...] > > }; > > > > struct epoll_wait_spec { > [...] > > } EPOLL_PACKED; > > Either both or none of these should mention that EPOLL_PACKED is in fact > part of the actual definition. The changelog for 3/6 sorta mentions > that it's not really needed for epoll_mod_cmd. Why is it necessary for > either struct? Yeah. it's probably not really necessary. > > > RETURN VALUE > > > > When successful, epoll_mod_wait() returns the number of file > > descriptors ready for the requested I/O, or zero if no file descriptor > > became ready during the requested timeout milliseconds. > > And here, it doesn't make sense to mention a unit, since the new timeout > is given using struct timespec (this was the whole point, right?). Right! Thanks, Fam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html