[PATCH] fs: super: do not cacheline align s_{inode,dentry}_lru

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



super_block->s_{inode,dentry}_lru were made cacheline aligned, because
the list_lru struct had a spinlock and a list embedded to it and
therefore could be actively modified.

Today, struct list_lru is, in fact, read-only: the lists and locks live
in list_lru_node's, which list_lru points to. The list_lru_node struct
is already cacheline aligned by definition.

So let us drop the cacheline aligned annotation in order not to waste
space in struct super_block.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/fs.h |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 0bd9669ce91d..790e534adbc7 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1309,12 +1309,9 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct workqueue_struct *s_dio_done_wq;
 	struct hlist_head s_pins;
 
-	/*
-	 * Keep the lru lists last in the structure so they always sit on their
-	 * own individual cachelines.
-	 */
-	struct list_lru		s_dentry_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-	struct list_lru		s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+	struct list_lru		s_dentry_lru;
+	struct list_lru		s_inode_lru;
+
 	struct rcu_head		rcu;
 
 	/*
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux