Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] epoll topics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In addition, Eric Wong has proposed a scheme using 'wait free queues' to
> improve lock contention between wakeups and event gathering:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/14/14.

Thanks for bringing this up again.  wfcqueue for epoll is still on hold
until I take care of other problems in userspace.  I'd welcome other
interested folks to help get it into shape again.

> In addition, we've observed some short comings from our production systems.
> Because wait queues are woken up in order, we can get unfair loading
> across threads,

Are you referring to LIFO scheduling of epoll_wait calling
__add_wait_queue_exclusive?  I always thought LIFO was preferable
since it kept the same threads active to reduce cache misses.

> and we can also receive unecessary wakeups. It would be
> great to discuss these topics further.

I'm happy to discuss via email; but I don't travel well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux