Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND] Richacls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/13/2015 08:53 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:40:29PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:23:26PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
On of the differences is that permissions in POSIX ACLs do
accumulate, while in NFSv4 and CIFS ACLs, and therefore also
richacls, they do not. So the two models are really not
interchangeable, however annoying that may be.

I think Andreas got do and do not reversed (though looks like everyone read
it the right way...)

Yes, sorry.

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux