Maintainer of FAT fs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Maintainer of FAT fs?
From: JPT <j-p-t@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:42:44 +0100
Cc: j-p-t@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0

Hi,

Seems like I have found a bug in FAT codepage mapping.
Where can I find a person hat feels responsible?

thanks,

Jan

ps. please CC, I'm not subscribed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maintainer of FAT fs?
  - From: Randy Dunlap

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] fs/aio: fix sleeping while TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
Next by Date: [GIT PULL] UDF & isofs fixes for 3.19-rc3
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] 9p: fix error handling in v9fs_file_do_lock
Next by thread: Re: Maintainer of FAT fs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux