Re: [RFC][PATCHES] iov_iter.c rewrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I certainly had missed that insanity during the analysis - we don't do
> a lot of O_DIRECT IO to/from kernel addresses of any sort...  This
> codepath allows it ;-/  Ability to trigger it is equivalent to ability
> to run any code in kernel mode, so it's not an additional security hole,
> but...

Is there any chance we could just return EINVAL for this case?

Who does O_DIRECT on module load anyway? If this is only for
finit_module(), that uses "kernel_read()", and maybe we could just
make sure that the kernel_read() function never ever uses the
direct-IO paths?

[ Time passes, I look at the code ]

Oh crap. So the reason it triggers seems to be that we basically get a
random file descriptor that we didn't open, and then we have

  vfs_read() ->
  xfs_file_operations->read() ->
  ew_sync_read() ->
  xfs_file_operations->read_iter()
  xfs_file_read_iter()

and we are stuck with this iterator that really just wants to do copies.

How about we make "kernel_read()" just clear O_DIRECT? Does that fix
it to just use copies?

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux