On Thu, 2014-11-13 at 08:10 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > The tree which these patches were based on seem to have more than a > > plain rename. For example I get > > Right, looks like something has gone missing along the way. Ahh .. I get it now. > The tree the patches are against is just a local clone of the Linus tree > with the patches I'd sent previously applied. > > Folding these recent patches into the original series and sending one > series only that applies on the current Linus tree should sort out the > problem. > > > > > --- fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h > > +++ fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h Looks like the patches I sent on 3rd Dec, which is what Joe commented on, were missed. It's probably better for me to start over once its decided how I'll be sending the patches. Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
