On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:00:56PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > In a nutshell HMM is a subsystem that provide an easy to use api to mirror a > > process address on a device with minimal hardware requirement (mainly device > > page fault and read only page mapping). This does not rely on ATS and PASID > > PCIE extensions. It intends to supersede those extensions by allowing to move > > system memory to device memory in a transparent fashion for core kernel mm > > code (ie cpu page fault on page residing in device memory will trigger > > migration back to system memory). > > Could we define a new NUMA node that maps memory from the GPU and > then simply use the existing NUMA features to move a process over there. Sorry for late reply, i am traveling and working on an updated patchset to change the device page table design to something simpler and easier to grasp. So GPU process will never run on CPU nor will they have a kernel task struct associated with them. From core kernel point of view they do not exist. I hope that at one point down the line the hw will allow for better integration with kernel core but it's not there yet. So the NUMA idea was considered early on but was discarded as it's not really appropriate. You can have several CPU thread working with several GPU thread at the same time and they can either access disjoint memory or some share memory. Usual case will be few kbytes of share memory for synchronization btw CPU and GPU threads. But when a GPU job is launch we want most of the memory it will use to be migrated to device memory. Issue is that the device memory is not accessible from the CPU (PCIE bar are too small). So there is no way to keep the memory mapped for the CPU. We do need to mark the memory as unaccessible to the CPU and then migrate it to the GPU memory. Now when there is a CPU page fault on some migrated memory we need to migrate memory back to system memory. Hence why i need to tie HMM with some core MM code so that on this kind of fault core kernel knows it needs to call into HMM which will perform housekeeping and starts migration back to system memory. So technicaly there is no task migration only memory migration. Is there something i missing inside NUMA or some NUMA work in progress that change NUMA sufficiently that it might somehow address the use case i am describing above ? Cheers, Jérôme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
