On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 10:18 -0700, josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:37:00AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > On 10/20/2014 02:48 PM, Pieter Smith wrote: > > > Many embedded systems will not need this syscall, and omitting it > > > saves space. Add a new EXPERT config option CONFIG_SENDFILE_SYSCALL > > > (default y) to support compiling it out. > > > > <bikeshed> > > I believe these options ought to be CONFIG_SYSCALL_* > > </bikeshed> > > I agree. I think people started using CONFIG_*_SYSCALL because of > things like AUDITSYSCALL AUDITSYSCALL audits syscalls. It doesn't actually implement any syscalls. You are right about SYSFS_SYSCALL though... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
