During list_for_each_entry_safe, next_i is becoming free causing the loop to never terminate. Advance next_i in those cases where __iget is not done. Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxx> --- fs/notify/inode_mark.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c index 9ce0622..e849714 100644 --- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c +++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c @@ -288,20 +288,25 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct list_head *list) spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); /* In case the dropping of a reference would nuke next_i. */ - if ((&next_i->i_sb_list != list) && - atomic_read(&next_i->i_count)) { + while (&next_i->i_sb_list != list) { spin_lock(&next_i->i_lock); - if (!(next_i->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE))) { + if (!(next_i->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) && + atomic_read(&next_i->i_count)) { __iget(next_i); need_iput = next_i; + spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock); + break; } spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock); + next_i = list_entry(next_i->i_sb_list.next, + struct inode, i_sb_list); } /* - * We can safely drop inode_sb_list_lock here because we hold - * references on both inode and next_i. Also no new inodes - * will be added since the umount has begun. + * We can safely drop inode_sb_list_lock here because either + * we actually hold references on both inode and next_i or + * end of list. Also no new inodes will be added since the + * umount has begun. */ spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock); -- 1.7.11.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html