On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed 24-09-14 22:04:28, Li Xi wrote:
>> This patch adds a new internal field of ext4 inode to save project
>> identifier. Also a new flag EXT4_INODE_PROJINHERIT is added for
>> inheriting project ID from parent directory.
> Nice. Just a few smaller things below.
>
> Firstly, I think your patch forgets to add a check to EXT4_IOC_SETFLAGS
> ioctl so that EXT4_INODE_PROJINHERIT flag can be set only when
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_PROJECT is enabled.
PROJINHERIT is a flag which affects the project ID inheriting. Is there
any special reason that this flag can be set/cleared only if
EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_PROJECT is enabled? We don't check
that feature even when set/get project ID now, so I am not so sure
that this is consistent.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Xi <lixi@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>> fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 6 ++++++
>> fs/ext4/inode.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> fs/ext4/namei.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> fs/ext4/super.c | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
> ...
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>> index 5b87fc3..b6b7284 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>> @@ -756,6 +756,12 @@ struct inode *__ext4_new_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
>> inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid;
>> } else
>> inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode);
>> + if (ext4_test_inode_flag(dir, EXT4_INODE_PROJINHERIT)) {
>> + ei->i_projid = EXT4_I(dir)->i_projid;
>> + } else {
>> + ei->i_projid =
>> + make_kprojid(&init_user_ns, EXT4_DEF_PROJID);
>> + }
>> dquot_initialize(inode);
>>
>> if (!goal)
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index d5dd7d4..8c641eb 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -3874,6 +3874,24 @@ static inline void ext4_iget_extra_inode(struct inode *inode,
>> EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off = 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static projid_t ext4_inode_projid_get(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_inode *raw,
>> + struct ext4_inode_info *ei)
>> +{
>> + return (projid_t)le32_to_cpu(raw->i_projid);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ext4_inode_projid_set(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_inode *raw,
>> + struct ext4_inode_info *ei, projid_t projid)
>> +{
>> + raw->i_projid = cpu_to_le32(projid);
>> +}
> I don't see a need for these two wrappers. IMHO they just obfuscate the
> code. Please just write the code directly in appropriate place.
Sure.
>
>> @@ -4204,7 +4228,8 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t *handle,
>> EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME(i_atime, inode, raw_inode);
>> EXT4_EINODE_SET_XTIME(i_crtime, ei, raw_inode);
>>
>> - if (ext4_inode_blocks_set(handle, raw_inode, ei)) {
>> + err = ext4_inode_blocks_set(handle, raw_inode, ei);
>> + if (err) {
>> spin_unlock(&ei->i_raw_lock);
>> goto out_brelse;
>> }
> This is an unrelated fix, right? Please send as a separate patch. Thanks!
No problem!
>
>> @@ -4255,6 +4280,8 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t *handle,
>>
>> ext4_inode_csum_set(inode, raw_inode, ei);
>>
>> + ext4_inode_projid_set(inode, raw_inode, ei, i_projid);
>> +
> This is wrong - you have to set project ID before a checksum is computed.
Yeah, sorry for this mistake.
Regards,
- Li Xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
