On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:10:20PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Yeah, I'm aware of that but I decided I won't bother Li Xi with that > since it's independent issue and 8 bytes aren't that terrible. For the inode of which we have so many instances it is. Especially when only one filesystem can make use of this new field. > Personally > I somewhat prefer what I did in > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg74927.html > where we don't introduce additional method but rather a table with field > offsets in superblock. If people agree with this, I can cook up a patch for > quota relatively quickly. There's an even better way. We stopped calling the dquot_* functions from generic code, so now the filesystem can simply pass in a pointer to the dquot array. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
