Re: Name hashing function causing a perf regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> So the question is what do we do here?  I tested other random strings
> and every one of them ended up worse as far as collisions go with the
> new function vs the old one.  I assume we want to keep the word at a
> time functionality, so should we switch to a different hashing scheme,
> like murmur3/fnv/xxhash/crc32c/whatever?  Or should we just go back to

Would be interesting to try murmur3.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux