On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:35:09PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > If header B has an API like > typeA1 b_foo(typeA2 a2, typeA3 a3); > where typeA1, typeA2, typeA3 are from an included header A > and code in C.c needs the use of b_foo(), or even say b_foo is a vector > that C.c needs to implement. Then typeA1, typeA2, typeA3 are explicit > by B not implicit. > > Implicit is if B has private structures with say typeXy from header X > but my code does not need to declare or implement any X types. in order > to use public API of B. If I change B to no longer include A, and declare, but not define types A1-A3, a file which relies on the inclusion of B to define types A1-A3 is now broken. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
