Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] security: make security_file_set_fowner, f_setown and __f_setown void return

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:38:28AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> security_file_set_fowner always returns 0, so make it f_setown and
> __f_setown void return functions and fix up the error handling in the
> callers.

All the LSMs seems to use this purely for setting up pointers, and not
having to handle errors in the locking code for it will make life a lot
simpler.  I like this a lot.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux