RE: [HELP]: about aio+dio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks you help!

Jianpeng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zach Brown [mailto:zab@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:04 AM
> To: Ma, Jianpeng
> Cc: viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sage Weil; Mark Kirkwood; linux-aio@xxxxxxxxx;
> linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [HELP]: about aio+dio
> 
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:34:44AM +0000, Ma, Jianpeng wrote:
> > For aio+directio:
> > After io_submit, the content in request-queue of block-device.
> > In blkdev_fsync(), it will cal blkdev_issue_flush. This operation make all
> request to disk.
> >
> > Or am I missing something?
> 
> You can't rely on implementation details of how far aio operations are
> processed before io_submit returns.  It'd be entirely valid to implement aio by
> only copying the iocb structures from user space and handing them off to kernel
> threads before returning from io_submit().  In that case the kernel wouldn't
> even know what file descriptors the aios reference when fsync is called.
> 
> So what you describe might be true today (I doubt it, but I'm not going to look),
> but an application that relied on those assumptions runs a good chance of
> breaking in the future.
> 
> - z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux