Re: [PATCH] locks: pass correct "before" pointer to locks_unlink_lock in generic_add_lease

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 06:36:19AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The argument to locks_unlink_lock can't be just any pointer to a
> pointer. It must be a pointer to the fl_next field in the previous
> lock in the list.

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

This might explain some memory corruption I saw in the lease code while
trying out a new creative (ab-)user of the lease code..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux