2014-08-15 오전 6:22, Andrew Morton 쓴 글:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:15:40 +0900 Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
A buffer cache is allocated from movable area
because it is referred for a while and released soon.
But some filesystems are taking buffer cache for a long time
and it can disturb page migration.
A new API should be introduced to allocate buffer cache from
non-movable area.
I think the API could and should be more flexible than this.
Rather than making the API be "movable or not movable", let's permit
callers to specify the gfp_t and leave it at that. That way, if
someone later wants to allocate a buffer head with, I dunno,
__GFP_NOTRACK then they can do so.
So the word "movable" shouldn't appear in buffer.c at all, except in a
single place.
Absolutely I agree with you.
If filesystem developers agree this patch I will send 2nd patch that applies your ideas.
Thank you for your advices.
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev,
*/
static int
grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
- pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits)
+ pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits, gfp_t movable_mask)
s/movable_mask/gfp/
I got it.
{
struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode;
struct page *page;
@@ -1003,7 +1003,8 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
gfp_t gfp_mask;
gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS;
- gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE;
+ if (movable_mask & __GFP_MOVABLE)
+ gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE;
This becomes
gfp_mask |= gfp;
I got it.
/*
* XXX: __getblk_slow() can not really deal with failure and
* will endlessly loop on improvised global reclaim. Prefer
@@ -1058,7 +1059,8 @@ failed:
* that page was dirty, the buffers are set dirty also.
*/
static int
-grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
+grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ int size, gfp_t movable_mask)
gfp
{
pgoff_t index;
int sizebits;
@@ -1085,11 +1087,12 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
}
/* Create a page with the proper size buffers.. */
- return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits);
+ return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits, movable_mask);
}
static struct buffer_head *
-__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
+__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ int size, gfp_t movable_mask)
gfp
{
/* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
@@ -1111,7 +1114,7 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
if (bh)
return bh;
- ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
+ ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size, movable_mask);
gfp
if (ret < 0)
return NULL;
if (ret == 0)
@@ -1385,11 +1388,34 @@ __getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
might_sleep();
if (bh == NULL)
- bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size);
+ bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, __GFP_MOVABLE);
Here is the place where buffer.c. mentions "movable".
I got it.
return bh;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk);
+ /*
+ * __getblk_nonmovable will locate (and, if necessary, create) the buffer_head
+ * which corresponds to the passed block_device, block and size. The
+ * returned buffer has its reference count incremented.
+ *
+ * The page cache is allocated from non-movable area
+ * not to prevent page migration.
+ *
+ * __getblk()_nonmovable will lock up the machine
+ * if grow_dev_page's try_to_free_buffers() attempt is failing. FIXME, perhaps?
+ */
+struct buffer_head *
+__getblk_nonmovable(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
+
+ might_sleep();
+ if (bh == NULL)
+ bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, 0);
+ return bh;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk_nonmovable);
Suggest this be called __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, gfp) and then
__getblk() be changed to call __getblk_gfp(..., __GFP_MOVABLE).
We could then write a __getblk_nonmovable() which calls __getblk_gfp()
(a static inlined one-line function) or we can just call
__getblk_gfp(..., 0) directly from filesystems.
I got it.
@@ -1423,6 +1450,28 @@ __bread(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
+/**
+ * __bread_nonmovable() - reads a specified block and returns the bh
+ * @bdev: the block_device to read from
+ * @block: number of block
+ * @size: size (in bytes) to read
+ *
+ * Reads a specified block, and returns buffer head that contains it.
+ * The page cache is allocated from non-movable area
+ * not to prevent page migration.
+ * It returns NULL if the block was unreadable.
+ */
+struct buffer_head *
+__bread_nonmovable(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, 0);
+
+ if (likely(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ bh = __bread_slow(bh);
+ return bh;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread_nonmovable);
Treat this in the same fashion as __getblk_nonmovable().
I got it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
