On 8/12/2014 00:46, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:43:57 +0800
> Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> v2: Fix bad using of struct file_lock_operations for handle the owner.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 2e80a59..24a8d91 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -4867,9 +4867,33 @@ nfs4_transform_lock_offset(struct file_lock *lock)
>> lock->fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline struct nfs4_lockowner *get_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
>> +{
>> + atomic_inc(&lo->lo_owner.so_count);
>> + return lo;
>> +}
>> +
>
> The other places that increment the so_count on a lockowner should
> probably be changed to use get_lockowner.
Got it, thanks.
>
> Or what may be better is to make a nfs4_get_stateowner call and change
> all of the places that bump the so_count to use it. Then you could just
> do something like this in the right spot below:
>
> file_lock->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockowner(nfs4_get_stateowner(lock_sop));
Yes, nfs4_get_stateowner corresponds with nfs4_put_stateowner.
>> +static void nfsd4_fl_copy_owner(struct file_lock *dst, struct file_lock *src)
>> +{
>> + struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *) src->fl_owner;
>> + dst->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t) get_lockowner(lo);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void nfsd4_fl_release_owner(struct file_lock *fl)
>> +{
>> + struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *) fl->fl_owner;
>> +
>> + if (lo) {
>> + nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
>> + fl->fl_owner = NULL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Hack!: For now, we're defining this just so we can use a pointer to it
>> * as a unique cookie to identify our (NFSv4's) posix locks. */
>
> The above comment should be removed now.
OK, will remove it in next version.
thanks,
Kinglong Mee
>
>> static const struct lock_manager_operations nfsd_posix_mng_ops = {
>> + .lm_copy_owner = nfsd4_fl_copy_owner,
>> + .lm_release_owner = nfsd4_fl_release_owner,
>> };
>>
>> static inline void
>> @@ -5238,7 +5262,8 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>> status = nfserr_openmode;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - file_lock->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lock_sop;
>> +
>> + file_lock->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)get_lockowner(lock_sop);
>> file_lock->fl_pid = current->tgid;
>> file_lock->fl_file = filp;
>> file_lock->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
>> @@ -5405,6 +5430,7 @@ nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>> struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
>> struct file *filp = NULL;
>> struct file_lock *file_lock = NULL;
>> + struct nfs4_lockowner *lock_sop = NULL;
>> __be32 status;
>> int err;
>> struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
>> @@ -5426,6 +5452,8 @@ nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>> status = nfserr_lock_range;
>> goto put_stateid;
>> }
>> +
>> + lock_sop = lockowner(stp->st_stateowner);
>> file_lock = locks_alloc_lock();
>> if (!file_lock) {
>> dprintk("NFSD: %s: unable to allocate lock!\n", __func__);
>> @@ -5434,7 +5462,7 @@ nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>> }
>> locks_init_lock(file_lock);
>> file_lock->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
>> - file_lock->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockowner(stp->st_stateowner);
>> + file_lock->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)get_lockowner(lock_sop);
>> file_lock->fl_pid = current->tgid;
>> file_lock->fl_file = filp;
>> file_lock->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
