On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:17:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I have rebased my changes against vfs.git#for-eric and my changes work > just fine on top of the base you have built. The changes are avaiable > in user-namespace.git#vfs-detach-mounts10 so you just be able to just > pull the changes in. > > Reading your pile #1 pull request to Linus it sounds like you are > planning to suck all of this into the vfs tree. I am. Questions: * is there any reason why we need list instead of hlist for per-mountpoint list of mounts? Looks like hlist would do just as well, and it's a bit less noise * __d_unalias() change looks rather odd. What we do there is _not_ "avoid leaking mounts", it's "don't get a bunch of existing mounts suddenly relocate". What's up with that one? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
