On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 14:35 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Because of the direct_access() API which returns a PFN. partitions > better start on 4K boundary, else offset ZERO of a partition will > not be aligned and blk_direct_access() will fail the call. > > By setting blk_queue_physical_block_size(PAGE_SIZE) we can communicate > this to fdisk and friends. > Note that blk_queue_physical_block_size() also trashes io_min, but > we can leave this one to be 512. > > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/block/brd.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c > index 9673704..514cfe1 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/brd.c > +++ b/drivers/block/brd.c > @@ -495,10 +495,17 @@ static struct brd_device *brd_alloc(int i) > brd->brd_queue = blk_alloc_queue(GFP_KERNEL); > if (!brd->brd_queue) > goto out_free_dev; > + > blk_queue_make_request(brd->brd_queue, brd_make_request); > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(brd->brd_queue, 1024); > blk_queue_bounce_limit(brd->brd_queue, BLK_BOUNCE_ANY); > > + /* This is so fdisk will align partitions on 4k, because of > + * direct_access API needing 4k alignment, returning a PFN > + */ > + blk_queue_physical_block_size(brd->brd_queue, PAGE_SIZE); > + brd->brd_queue->limits.io_min = 512; /* Don't use the accessor */ > + > brd->brd_queue->limits.discard_granularity = PAGE_SIZE; > brd->brd_queue->limits.max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX; > brd->brd_queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 1; Is there an error case that this patch fixes? I've had page alignment checks in my PRD direct_access code forever, and I don't know if they've ever tripped. Also, blk_queue_physical_block_size() seems wrong - here's the comment for that function: /** * blk_queue_physical_block_size - set physical block size for the queue * @q: the request queue for the device * @size: the physical block size, in bytes * * Description: * This should be set to the lowest possible sector size that the * hardware can operate on without reverting to read-modify-write * operations. */ It doesn't sound like this is what you're after? It sounds like instead you want to control the alignment, not minimum natural I/O size? It seems like if you did want to do this, blk_queue_alignment_offset() would be more what you were after? - Ross -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
